Posted on: 02/02/24 07:37PM
If even one woman wants to fight in a war, then that contradicts your point. They don’t have to be a majority. We don’t live in a world that can accurately determine if women are fit for war like men, because they still have a long way to go before they are accepted as legitimate soldiers like their male counterparts. Someone like you, who is vehemently opposed to war and only sees it as an atrocious act full of horrifying death and tragedy would obviously be biased against it. Some people are more patriotic and can undergo the risks in battle knowing that they are fighting for a noble cause. I mean, unless women do the things that they are said to not -want- to do, then we will never know. That includes all the physical feats that those biocentrists say are only possible by men. Okay, that is certainly true as of now, at least until a woman does it and proves otherwise.
How are you simultaneously against women in videogames being portrayed inaccurately because of double standards about objectifying women and yet you’re going to freely
disregard all the war propaganda that men consume from boyhood until they are old enough to be soldiers? There are no accurate statistics until all of that bullshit is gone, if it is ever gone. The simple truth though is that civilization is writhe with inequality and we have to wrestle with that on a daily basis.
Hee-Ho said: Saying otherwise is a "strawman" (onlyfan girls are fake lmao) and missing the point, good job showing us one of reasons why a majority of people, even womans, hates feminism as much as extremists (which they are).
I hate to say it, but that’s what a strawman fallacy is: an imagined construction of someone else’s argument that isn’t actually the one that is held, and you mistakenly perceive it to be the real one and argue with it instead.
None of you really have anything important to say, and you’re not even engaging with my points, so I’m gonna let it go.