Now Viewing: Subjective Tagging Discussion
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
Quote
Posted on: 05/28/11 11:28AM
cum_on_balls -> cum_on_testicles
Remove penis_in_male_anus
Remove male_nipples
Remove boy_rape (?)
Remove malesub (?)
Remove cum_on_boy (?)
What think
Just to make a note of it: re-remove cum_in_boy.
Remove penis_in_male_anus
Remove male_nipples
Remove boy_rape (?)
Remove malesub (?)
Remove cum_on_boy (?)
What think
Just to make a note of it: re-remove cum_in_boy.
Posted on: 05/28/11 04:50PM
Re-remove oh_shit...? It came back.
cum_on_balls -> cum_on_testicles --- maybe alias
Remove penis_in_male_anus --- don't care either way
Remove male_nipples --- redundant tag
Remove boy_rape (?) shota + rape
Remove malesub (?) ? not necessarily the same as femdom but mostly the same from the post I've seen
Remove cum_on_boy (?) cum + shota
cum_on_balls -> cum_on_testicles --- maybe alias
Remove penis_in_male_anus --- don't care either way
Remove male_nipples --- redundant tag
Remove boy_rape (?) shota + rape
Remove malesub (?) ? not necessarily the same as femdom but mostly the same from the post I've seen
Remove cum_on_boy (?) cum + shota
Posted on: 05/29/11 06:34AM
ILM loves to eat sexual tags.
Posted on: 05/29/11 06:40AM
i_love_pixiv said:
ILM loves to eat sexual tags.
ILM loves to eat sexual tags.
With this fucking flood detection I'm not going to be eating any tags for a while
Posted on: 05/30/11 02:49AM
Just wanted to rebring this up 'cause I really wanna get all up in this shit and normalize it.
Also some what related, what's the deal with the tag flood prevention stuff? Was it put up in response to these stupid bots or is it a resource saving thing?
ShadowbladeEdge said:
So I was poking about and came to find that there are #girls tags going consistently up to 20girls and then sporadicly on up to 47girls. #boys is similar, but unsurprisingly less pronounced. So which way should this go, 6+ for anything, well 6+ of course, or the actual number for everything 6 and above?
So I was poking about and came to find that there are #girls tags going consistently up to 20girls and then sporadicly on up to 47girls. #boys is similar, but unsurprisingly less pronounced. So which way should this go, 6+ for anything, well 6+ of course, or the actual number for everything 6 and above?
Also some what related, what's the deal with the tag flood prevention stuff? Was it put up in response to these stupid bots or is it a resource saving thing?
Posted on: 05/30/11 02:52AM
For that second note: A bit of both if I had to guess. I just noticed a lot of mention of bots over the past 2 days... and resource problems have always been an issue.
For the first note: I'd make it my opinion to stop the numbering anywhere from 5-10. Anything beyond that seems pointless to count.
For the first note: I'd make it my opinion to stop the numbering anywhere from 5-10. Anything beyond that seems pointless to count.
Posted on: 05/30/11 02:53AM
ShadowbladeEdge said:
Just wanted to rebring this up 'cause I really wanna get all up in this shit and normalize it.
Also some what related, what's the deal with the tag flood prevention stuff? Was it put up in response to these stupid bots or is it a resource saving thing?
Just wanted to rebring this up 'cause I really wanna get all up in this shit and normalize it.
ShadowbladeEdge said:
So I was poking about and came to find that there are #girls tags going consistently up to 20girls and then sporadicly on up to 47girls. #boys is similar, but unsurprisingly less pronounced. So which way should this go, 6+ for anything, well 6+ of course, or the actual number for everything 6 and above?
So I was poking about and came to find that there are #girls tags going consistently up to 20girls and then sporadicly on up to 47girls. #boys is similar, but unsurprisingly less pronounced. So which way should this go, 6+ for anything, well 6+ of course, or the actual number for everything 6 and above?
Also some what related, what's the deal with the tag flood prevention stuff? Was it put up in response to these stupid bots or is it a resource saving thing?
Yes.
Posted on: 05/30/11 03:00AM
Deusexcalamus said:
Yes.
ShadowbladeEdge said:
Just wanted to rebring this up 'cause I really wanna get all up in this shit and normalize it.
Also some what related, what's the deal with the tag flood prevention stuff? Was it put up in response to these stupid bots or is it a resource saving thing?
Just wanted to rebring this up 'cause I really wanna get all up in this shit and normalize it.
ShadowbladeEdge said:
So I was poking about and came to find that there are #girls tags going consistently up to 20girls and then sporadicly on up to 47girls. #boys is similar, but unsurprisingly less pronounced. So which way should this go, 6+ for anything, well 6+ of course, or the actual number for everything 6 and above?
So I was poking about and came to find that there are #girls tags going consistently up to 20girls and then sporadicly on up to 47girls. #boys is similar, but unsurprisingly less pronounced. So which way should this go, 6+ for anything, well 6+ of course, or the actual number for everything 6 and above?
Also some what related, what's the deal with the tag flood prevention stuff? Was it put up in response to these stupid bots or is it a resource saving thing?
Yes.
Yes to what, if I might ask?
Posted on: 05/30/11 08:26AM
ShadowbladeEdge said:
Yes to what, if I might ask?
Deusexcalamus said:
Yes.
ShadowbladeEdge said:
Also some what related, what's the deal with the tag flood prevention stuff? Was it put up in response to these stupid bots or is it a resource saving thing?
Also some what related, what's the deal with the tag flood prevention stuff? Was it put up in response to these stupid bots or is it a resource saving thing?
Yes.
Yes to what, if I might ask?
The former.
I'd wouldn't mind going to Danbooru's character numbering system, but maybe with a bit of a higher number. 8+ or 10+, something like that. Considering how many images we get from you, however, that might be an annoying thing to try.
And I have this sneaking suspicion someone will say 6+ is not specific enough, but who the heck is searching for "47girls"?
Posted on: 05/30/11 08:36AM
internetlovemachine said:
I'd wouldn't mind going to Danbooru's character numbering system, but maybe with a bit of a higher number. 8+ or 10+, something like that. Considering how many images we get from you, however, that might be an annoying thing to try.
I'd wouldn't mind going to Danbooru's character numbering system, but maybe with a bit of a higher number. 8+ or 10+, something like that. Considering how many images we get from you, however, that might be an annoying thing to try.
Well it's looks like only about 30-35 images with 6+girls float down here every week, so it I don't think it'd be that much of a hassle. It's also like 1-5 for 6+boys it seems.
Add Reply