Notice: My personal stance on AI generated artwork. Retweet and share if you agree. Let us discuss, and not immediately scream bloody murder.

Now Viewing: Subjective Tagging Discussion
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.

internetlovemachine - Group: Fleet Admiral Cat - Total Posts: 3836
user_avatar
Posted on: 06/24/11 07:54PM

Xalrun said:
I wish I could just flat out remove that stupid tag.


You're not the only one.

I've sort of justified to myself that since I can't get rid of it, it has a use

Even though that use is never actually used right.

e: I just (re-)realized the options are deal with it or lock every single image that gets fucked with like that.

I personally don't like locking images like that for that reason because it seems a bit frivolous to me, but maybe having everything they touch become un-editable might do something...



Anti_Gendou - Group: Moderator - Total Posts: 4366
user_avatar
Posted on: 06/25/11 12:04AM

I guess I can support the removal of "oppai_loli".

I'm reluctant to because I used it in the past. But I haven't used it in months so...

Breasts + ... something else could suffice. Something that suggests its a small or young person with breasts that don't match the size of their body.



internetlovemachine - Group: Fleet Admiral Cat - Total Posts: 3836
user_avatar
Posted on: 06/25/11 12:18AM

Anti_Gendou said:
I guess I can support the removal of "oppai_loli".

I'm reluctant to because I used it in the past. But I haven't used it in months so...

Breasts + ... something else could suffice. Something that suggests its a small or young person with breasts that don't match the size of their body.


It was created as a trophy tag, and was made into something you could argue is objective.

Not that it's ever used objectively.



Xalrun - Group: Moderator - Total Posts: 4706
user_avatar
Posted on: 06/25/11 08:56AM

internetlovemachine said:
It was created as a trophy tag, and was made into something you could argue is objective.

Not that it's ever used objectively.

gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...tag_history&id=825839
here's another that warrants a locking. since those other guys backed off and raverkidd finally got atleast the slightest clue of what the hell he's tagging, it's mostly been kaoshima now.



internetlovemachine - Group: Fleet Admiral Cat - Total Posts: 3836
user_avatar
Posted on: 06/25/11 09:19AM

Xalrun said:
raverkidd finally got atleast the slightest clue of what the hell he's tagging


Tch.

That's funny.



Anti_Gendou - Group: Moderator - Total Posts: 4366
user_avatar
Posted on: 06/27/11 09:11PM

I just noticed that a tag called "titjob" exists with just a little under 200 entries I think. I can see how newer users might have ended up using this tag by not knowing what paizuri means.

Just thought I should mention it.



internetlovemachine - Group: Fleet Admiral Cat - Total Posts: 3836
user_avatar
Posted on: 06/27/11 09:13PM

You wanna know how many images were tagged "titjob" but not "paizuri"?

Out of 182 images, nine.



Anti_Gendou - Group: Moderator - Total Posts: 4366
user_avatar
Posted on: 06/27/11 09:15PM

Which may add to my belief that they didn't know or were too lazy to figure out that paizuri was doing the job for them.

Also found a tag called "multiple_penis" I lol'd. But it has hardly any entries by comparison of how many it should if it were an accepted tag.



BlueBaroness - Group: Dewrito Pope - Total Posts: 1278
user_avatar
Posted on: 06/30/11 02:34PM

Are any of these tags needed?

Muscle_loli (gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...mp;s=profile&id=72488 , the creator of said tag)

male_feet (gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...mp;s=profile&id=31353 )

long_hair_male (gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...mp;s=profile&id=87941 He's still at it. Right now, actually.)

hhhhnnnggg (gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...mp;s=profile&id=60657 He's still at it)

pig_fucked (gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...mp;s=profile&id=12377 )

excessive_cum (gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...mp;s=profile&id=12377 )

cum_on_stockings (This, the sock and the thighhighs tags could just be replaced by 'lower_body', right? Or is that too broad?)

The first three are just a matter of looking up one tag plus the other, right? I got rid of most of them ('long_hair_male' is still around. He's putting it in rather quickly), I just wanted to make sure before I started working on other tags (or in case they come back).



Jerl - Group: The Real Administrator - Total Posts: 6706
user_avatar
Posted on: 06/30/11 02:49PM

Yeah, most of those seem unnecessary and redundant, or in the case of excessive_cum, actually subjective. cum_on_stockings might be useful, though. People have very specific fetishes.



add_replyAdd Reply


«1617181920 21 2223242526»