Now Viewing: Question about the following tags: "large breasts", "huge breasts", and "gigantic breasts"
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
| MarqFJA87 | Group: Member - Total Posts: 13 |
|
Question about the following tags: "large breasts", "huge breasts", and "gigantic breasts"
Posted on: 06/30/12 04:04PM When you say "breasts should be X times larger than the character's head to qualify" (where X is an integer equal to or greater than 1), do you mean BOTH breasts' size combined, or each breast on its own? Because throughout my time surfing this site, I've seen pretty much each of the tags in the topic title being applied BOTH ways.
E.g.: one pic with the "huge breasts" tag may have the character's breasts COMBINED be "larger than but no more than than twice her head" (post #1568177); another with the same tag, however, would instead have a character whose breasts are EACH "larger than but no more than than twice her head", and COMBINED would be well beyond "twice as large as her head" (post #1566410). And this even extends to the "gigantic breasts" tag: pics like this (post #1558397), which despite featuring only ONE girl, has both the "gigantic breasts" and "huge breasts" tags. |
| jedi1357 | Group: Moderator - Total Posts: 1249 |
|
Posted on: 07/01/12 11:48AM Most of it is from Danbooru. It might be better to ask there. I thought it was "each breast".
Weather it's one or both it is still within the same order of magnitude. If not then it should probably be changed. Also: one qualifying tag is enough. |
| MarqFJA87 | Group: Member - Total Posts: 13 |
|
Posted on: 07/01/12 03:29PM Most of it is from Danbooru. It might be better to ask there. I thought it was "each breast". Very well. Going to ask the question there. Weather it's one or both it is still within the same order of magnitude. If not then it should probably be changed. I don't get how they're "within the same order of magnitude"; one interpretation would result in a size difference of at least 2 times greater than the other interpretation's. That's a very significant difference, especially at the higher sizes. Hence the need for clarity on which interpretation should be followed. Also: one qualifying tag is enough. Are you referring to the third image I linked (in which case, I agree wholeheartedly), or to something else in my post itself? |
| Jerl | Group: Moderator - Total Posts: 1940 |
|
Posted on: 07/01/12 10:44PM MarqFJA87 said: Also: one qualifying tag is enough. Are you referring to the third image I linked (in which case, I agree wholeheartedly), or to something else in my post itself? He means that only one of the breast size tags should be used for a given character. If there are more breast size tags than characters in an image, then something's wrong. For example, an image with two female characters with different breast sizes could have multiple tags, but an image of only one female character can only have one breast size tag. |
| MarqFJA87 | Group: Member - Total Posts: 13 |
|
Posted on: 07/02/12 09:33AM Just in from the Danbooru thread: It's supposed to be "each breast alone", not "both breasts together".
Jerl said: He means that only one of the breast size tags should be used for a given character. If there are more breast size tags than characters in an image, then something's wrong. For example, an image with two female characters with different breast sizes could have multiple tags, but an image of only one female character can only have one breast size tag. That much I already understood. The image that I cited seems to be a clear case of different taggers using different interpretations. |
| MarqFJA87 | Group: Member - Total Posts: 13 |
|
Bumping
Posted on: 04/27/13 08:56AM ... So, what's the verdict on what course of action should be taken?
|
| Jerl | Group: Moderator - Total Posts: 1940 |
|
Posted on: 04/27/13 09:45AM We follow Danbooru's policy, so go with that.
|