aperturescience11 commented at 2011-12-28 18:26:04 » #962266

Whaaa? Why have both the "otn" and "otm" tags been wiped? They're hardly "redundant", as the wiki for otn says.

5 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-12-28 18:52:14 » #962288

I'm guessing this'll be the next tag feud? Take it to the "Subjective Tagging Discussion" thread.

1 Points Flag

mrbeef523 commented at 2011-12-28 21:08:47 » #962386

You can't be "otn" without being "otm", so "otm" is redundant.

1 Points Flag

Daijin commented at 2011-12-28 21:31:10 » #962399

both otm and otn are not used anymore as otm has been wiped. So don't use either.

1 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-12-28 21:33:50 » #962401

Why? More tags are always good.

5 Points Flag

Daijin commented at 2011-12-28 21:35:32 » #962404

Redundant tags are not good.

3 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-12-28 22:42:38 » #962451

i love this.

6 Points Flag

aperturescience11 commented at 2011-12-29 00:21:28 » #962520

Anon1: otn and otm are not subjective tags. In this image, the gag surpasses the nose, hence making it "otn". That is an objective fact.

mfbeef523: I understand your point, however that does not mean that otm is always redundant. If the gag does not go over the nose, but does go over the mouth, then tagging the image with otm would not be redundant. Tagging with both otn and otm on an otn image, however, would be redundant.

tl;dr: otm is not always redundant.

5 Points Flag

conundrum commented at 2014-08-22 16:34:07 » #1590328

I believe this one is by SweetSprite, but I'm not 100% sure.

0 Points Flag

conundrum commented at 2014-08-22 16:35:29 » #1590329

Just checked, it is, adding it now.

0 Points Flag