It sounds like you're blocking JavaScript.

It does the same for me if I try to open it in another tab. I'm not blocking shit. It's always been like this.

Of course I've never had a NEED to open an edit window in another tab so I didn't care.

I'm not talking about the opening in new tab thing, I'm talking about how it says "about:blank#blocked". Normally it would just say "about:blank".

How does it work now for rating searches?
Before if I wanted questionable and safe posts i could just: -rating:e.
Now that there are 4 ratings this is not possible, -rating:e would return general, sensitive and questionable posts.
Danbooru doesn't have this issue cause it allows us to do rating:s,q

rating:general
rating:sensitive
rating:questionable
rating:explicit

Stuff like rating:e or -rating:q haven't been implemented here.

My question was on how to chain more rating filters, I don't care if I have to write the first letter or the full word.
Let me rewrite the question:

How does it work now for rating searches?
Before if I wanted questionable and safe posts i could just: -rating:explicit.
Now that there are 4 ratings this is not possible, -rating:explicit would return general, sensitive and questionable posts.
Danbooru doesn't have this issue cause it allows us to do rating:sensitive,questionable

You have to do negative searches.

"-rating:explicit" will still give safe (general and sensitive) and questionable results.
"-rating:general -rating:sensitive" will return questionable and explicit results.

Oh so you can use multiple -rating, great.
Thank you!

Yea, I tried just clicking it but nothing happened, that's when I figured I'd try to open it separately. Just occurred to though me to try disabling Tampermonkey; sure enough, TM was fucking with the page somehow and breaking it. Once I disabled, it let me use the function.

Thx


PS Another rating question. For this image: gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=7323834 it was rating "general" so I figured I'd change it now that I have the edit thing figured out. In that image, her pussy isn't exactly showing... that's is a seam on her stockings. Since no genitals, I'd assume it's technically "questionable" but given the nature of the seam it seems VERY suggestive of genitals so would it be explicit? I rated it exp as it certainly seems that way to me. I just went to the wiki and read about the ratings there too. Slightly confusing; I had thought any visible genitals were automatically explicit, but it said it's OK for questionable if not "blatantly exposed". So I think I may have inadvertently rated a couple questionables as explicit, as it was just a person standing full frontal nude on some.

Does the actual labia need to be visible? Like I'd rate this explicit: gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=7319060 but you technically cannot see it and the fluid all over her is sweat not "sexual bodily fluid". Speaking of fluids; so any cum in frame = explicit auto? What about a pic that would be questionable, yet involves a sexual type act: gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=7304378 I assume explicit as it's a sexual act, regardless of the ho-hum level of the image aside from that. Lastly, does nip/areola slip count toward questionable or still clears sensitive: gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=7286323? Sorry for the flood of questions, just want to avoid misrating.

PPS you should consider adding label tags for the radio button related text to the rating words in the edit screen. Much easier to hit than just the little radio button IMO.

This issue is symptomatic of a larger problem with the weebsphere: No one can agree on what is or isn't porn.

"Okay, so they're naked. But it's a parody! It's a clever satire! So really, you're thinking about it the wrong way."