Now Viewing: New post rating: General (report misuse here)
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
Quote
Posted on: 07/07/22 01:28PM
SFW content is the majority of our content. We aren't getting rid of it.
Posted on: 07/07/22 01:46PM
I'm with Jerl on this one, in that I don't just come here for smut. For sure, a lot of my favourites images aren't more than etchi if I'm honest. (=^_^=)
Posted on: 07/17/22 03:57AM
Not the change i wanted...
Posted on: 07/21/22 09:51AM
user:Twasis has quite a few explicit uploads that are tagged general.
Also I want to say that I do like SFW content here and would not want it to go away. However the claim that the majority of content here is SFW is dubious considering how many images are mistagged.
Also I want to say that I do like SFW content here and would not want it to go away. However the claim that the majority of content here is SFW is dubious considering how many images are mistagged.
Posted on: 07/23/22 04:57AM
If rating:sensitive is a subset of the old rating:safe, why are there so many results for "rating:sensitive loli"?
Posted on: 07/23/22 04:42PM
853214728 said:
If rating:sensitive is a subset of the old rating:safe, why are there so many results for "rating:sensitive loli"?
If rating:sensitive is a subset of the old rating:safe, why are there so many results for "rating:sensitive loli"?
Because you can have a loli image that’s safe, for example the AniDB image cover of the anime spy x family.
Posted on: 07/23/22 05:44PM
From the wiki entry for loli:
"Work-safe, non-sexual images of young girls should not be tagged as loli - that is what the child tag is for."
"Work-safe, non-sexual images of young girls should not be tagged as loli - that is what the child tag is for."
Posted on: 07/23/22 05:48PM
Also most of the results for "rating:sensitive loli" are sexual. They really should be rating:questionable imo.
I feel like the name "sensitive" was a bad decision if it is meant to be a subset of the old rating:safe. People adding new images are probably assuming sexually suggestive stuff fits under sensitive.
I feel like the name "sensitive" was a bad decision if it is meant to be a subset of the old rating:safe. People adding new images are probably assuming sexually suggestive stuff fits under sensitive.
Posted on: 07/25/22 09:31AM
I don't really understand the need for more than 3 ratings.
Safe: Not sexual or explicitly violent, no implications of mature themes, no swearing. No genitalia or nipples.
A child could legally view it
Questionable: Sexual or mature themes,violence and swearing but no visible penetration or genitalia.
A teenager could legally view it
Explicit: Sexual acts and extreme violence, as well as offensive political content.
Only adults should view it.
There. Why add another tag and make a simple system much more confusing.
Safe: Not sexual or explicitly violent, no implications of mature themes, no swearing. No genitalia or nipples.
A child could legally view it
Questionable: Sexual or mature themes,violence and swearing but no visible penetration or genitalia.
A teenager could legally view it
Explicit: Sexual acts and extreme violence, as well as offensive political content.
Only adults should view it.
There. Why add another tag and make a simple system much more confusing.
Posted on: 07/25/22 10:24AM
Simski said:
I don't really understand the need for more than 3 ratings.
Safe: Not sexual or explicitly violent, no implications of mature themes, no swearing. No genitalia or nipples.
A child could legally view it
Questionable: Sexual or mature themes,violence and swearing but no visible penetration or genitalia.
A teenager could legally view it
Explicit: Sexual acts and extreme violence, as well as offensive political content.
Only adults should view it.
There. Why add another tag and make a simple system much more confusing.
I don't really understand the need for more than 3 ratings.
Safe: Not sexual or explicitly violent, no implications of mature themes, no swearing. No genitalia or nipples.
A child could legally view it
Questionable: Sexual or mature themes,violence and swearing but no visible penetration or genitalia.
A teenager could legally view it
Explicit: Sexual acts and extreme violence, as well as offensive political content.
Only adults should view it.
There. Why add another tag and make a simple system much more confusing.
This change is not up for debate.
Add Reply